[international Law] Doesn't Show What The Constitution

The Principal Purpose Of Stare Decisis Is To Protect Reliance Interest And Further Stability In The Law.

The Court's Decision Reflects The Philosophy That Judges Should Endure Whatever Interpretive Distortions It Takes In Order To Correct A Supposed Flaw In The Statutory Machinery. That Philosophy Ignores The American People's Decision To Give Congress '[a]ll Legislative Powers' Enumerated In The Constitution. They Made Congress, Not This Court, Responsible For Both Making Laws And Mending Them.

Words Have Meaning. And Their Meaning Doesn't Change.

Scalia Said The Court Had Pretty Much Signed On To The So-called Homosexual Agenda, Adding: Let Me Be Clear That I Have Nothing Against Homosexuals, Or Any Other Group, Promoting Their Agenda Through Normal Democratic Means.

That's The Argument Of Flexibility And It Goes Something Like This: The Constitution Is Over 200 Years Old And Societies Change. It Has To Change With Society, Like A Living Organism, Or It Will Become Brittle And Break. But You Would Have To Be An Idiot To Believe That. The Constitution Is Not A Living Organism; It Is A Legal Document. It Says Something And Doesn't Say Other Things.