Scalia Said The Court Had Pretty Much

That's The Argument Of Flexibility And It Goes Something Like This: The Constitution Is Over 200 Years Old And Societies Change. It Has To Change With Society, Like A Living Organism, Or It Will Become Brittle And Break. But You Would Have To Be An Idiot To Believe That. The Constitution Is Not A Living Organism; It Is A Legal Document. It Says Something And Doesn't Say Other Things.

I Think The Main Fight Is To Dissuade Americans From What The Secularists Are Trying To Persuade Them To Be True: That The Separation Of Church And State Means That The Government Cannot Favor Religion Over Nonreligion.

When Did It Become Unconstitutional To Exclude Homosexual Couples From Marriage? 1791? 1868, When The 14th Amendment Was Adopted?

Persuade Your Fellow Citizens It's A Good Idea And Pass A Law. That's What Democracy Is All About. It's Not About Nine Superannuated Judges Who Have Been There Too Long, Imposing These Demands On Society.

Words No Longer Have Meaning If An Exchange That Is Not Established By A State Is "established By The State".