The Scientific Picture Of The World Championed

My Thesis Is That All Disciplines Find Their Completion In Christ And Cannot Be Properly Understood Apart From Christ.

The Young Earth-solution To Reconciling The Order Of Creation With Natural History Makes Good Exegetical And Theological Sense. Indeed, The Overwhelming Consensus Of Theologians Up Through The Reformation Held To This View. I Myself Would Adopt It In A Heartbeat Except That Nature Seems To Present Such Strong Evidence Against It.

I Believe God Created The World For A Purpose. The Designer Of Intelligent Design Is, Ultimately, The Christian God.

You Have To Understand, In The Current Academic Climate, Intelligent Design Is Like Leprosy Or Heresy In Times Past. To Be Tagged As An Id Supporter Is To Become An Academic Pariah, And This Holds Even At So-called Christian Institutions That Place A Premium On Respectability At The Expense Of Truth And The Offense Of The Gospel.

How A Designer Gets From Thought To Thing Is, At Least In Broad Strokes, Straightforward: (1) A Designer Conceives A Purpose. (2) To Accomplish That Purpose, The Designer Forms A Plan. (3) To Execute The Plan, The Designer Specifies Building Materials And Assembly Instructions. (4) Finally, The Designer Or Some Surrogate Applies The Assembly Instructions To The Building Materials. What Emerges Is A Designed Object, And The Designer Is Successful To The Degree That The Object Fulfills The Designer's Purpose.