The Freedom To Think Out Loud On

Water Is Two Parts Hydrogen And One Part Oxygen. What If Someone Says, “well, That’s Not How I Choose To Think About Water.”? All We Can Do Is Appeal To Scientific Values. And If He Doesn’t Share Those Values, The Conversation Is Over. If Someone Doesn’t Value Evidence, What Evidence Are You Going To Provide To Prove They Should Value It? If Someone Doesn’t Value Logic, What Logical Argument Could You Provide To Show The Importance Of Logic?

We Must Continually Remind Ourselves That There Is A Difference Between What Is Natural And What Is Actually Good For Us.

As Many Critics Of Religion Have Pointed Out, The Notion Of A Creator Poses An Immediate Problem Of An Infinite Regress. If God Created The Universe, What Created God? To Say That God, By Definition, Is Uncreated Simply Begs The Question. Any Being Capable Of Creating A Complex World Promises To Be Very Complex Himself. As The Biologist Richard Dawkins Has Observed Repeatedly, The Only Natural Process We Know Of That Could Produce A Being Capable Of Designing Things Is Evolution.

If Faith Is What You Have To Go On, If Faith Is The Link Between Your Beliefs And The World At Large, Your Beliefs Are Very Likely To Be Wrong. Beliefs Can Be Right Or Wrong. If You Believe You Can Fly, That Belief Is Only True If Indeed You Can Fly. Somebody Who Thinks He Can Fly, And Is Wrong About It, Will Eventually Discover There's A Problem With His View Of The World.

The Conflict Between Religion And Science Is Inherent And (very Nearly) Zero-sum. The Success Of Science Often Comes At The Expense Of Religious Dogma; The Maintenance Of Religious Dogma Always Comes At The Expense Of Science.