Speciesism Is Morally Objectionable Because, Like Racism,

If You Care About Animals, There Is One And Only One Choice: Go Vegan. Can You Choose Not To Be Vegan? Sure. You Can Choose Not To Care.

I Maintain That We Ought To Abolish The Institution And Stop Causing Or Facilitating The Existence Of More 'companion' Animals.

Michael Vick May Enjoy Watching Dogs Fight. Someone Else May Find That Repulsive But See Nothing Wrong With Eating An Animal Who Has Had A Life As Full Of Pain And Suffering As The Lives Of The Fighting Dogs. It's Strange That We Regard The Latter As Morally Different From, And Superior To, The Former.

We Do Not Need To Eat Animals, Wear Animals, Or Use Animals For Entertainment Purposes, And Our Only Defense Of These Uses Is Our Pleasure, Amusement, And Convenience.

I Find It Very Annoying That So Many Animal Advocates Talk About The Difficulty Of Being Vegan. Many Animal Advocates Are Inclined To Make The Issue Their Suffering And Not The Animals' Suffering, And I Suppose That Accounts For Part Of The Reason That Veganism Is Portrayed As Such A "sacrifice." And Many Animal Advocates Are Not Vegans, Or Are "flexible Vegans," Which Means That They Do Not Observe Veganism At All Or Not Consistently, And Emphasizing The Supposed Difficulty Of Veganism Is Part Of Justifying Their Own Behavior.