It Is Obvious That Putting The Arab-israeli

I Don't Want To Use The Term "nuclear Weapons" Because Those People In Iran Who Have Authority Say They Are Not Building Nuclear Weapons. I Make An Appeal To The Countries Who Do Have Nuclear Weapons. They Don't Consider Them A Nuclear Threat. But Let's Say A Country That Doesn't Have Nuclear Weapons Gets Involved In Building Them, Then They Are Told By Those That Already Have Nuclear Weapons That They Oppose [such A Development]. Where Is The Justice In That?

As A Politician Who Cherishes Religious Conviction In His Personal Sphere, But Regards Politics As A Domain Belonging Outside Religion, I Believe That This View Is Seriously Flawed.

Paramount Is The Need To Secure Human Rights. The Form Of Rule Should Be Such That The Citizen Does Not Have To Fear The State, But Gives It Direction And Confidently Participates In Its Administration.

It Is Impossible To Preserve My Friendship With People Who Are Allegedly Leaders When They Are Attacking Their Own People, Shooting At Them, Using Tanks And Other Forms Of Heavy Weaponry.

I Am Against Nuclear Weapons, Regardless Of Whether They Are In The Hands Of Iran Or Israel Or Any Western Country. But Obviously Some States Are Allowed To Have Weapons Of Mass Destruction While Others Are Not.