In The 19th Century The Anatomy Of

The Conclusion Of Intelligent Design Flows Naturally From The Data Itself - Not From Sacred Books Or Sectarian Beliefs. Inferring That Biochemical Systems Were Designed By An Intelligent Agent Is A Humdrum Process That Requires No New Principles Of Logic Or Science. It Comes Simply From The Hard Work That Biochemistry Has Done Over The Past Forty Years, Combined With Consideration Of The Way In Which We Reach Conclusions Of Design Every Day.

In Private Many Scientists Admit That Science Has No Explanation For The Beginning Of Life... Darwin Never Imagined The Exquisitely Profound Complexity That Exists Even At The Most Basic Levels Of Life.

The Trap Does Not Work Until All The Parts Were There. The System Itself Doesn't Work Until You Fit All Of Them Together.

I Find The Idea Of Common Descent (that All Organisms Share A Common Ancestor) Fairly Convincing, And Have No Particular Reason To Doubt It.

As The Number Of Unexplained, Irreducibly Complex Biological Systems Increases, Our Confidence That Darwin's Criterion Of Failure Has Been Met Skyrockets Toward The Maximum That Science Allows.