If You Talk About Sous-vide, Then You

Elections, For Their Part, Are Typically Popularity Contests Rather Than Measures Of Candidates' Relative Competency Or Effectiveness. Imagine If Scientific Truth Were Determined According To Which Scientist Was Most Popular. To Be Successful, Scientists Would Have To Be Charismatic And Attractive - And Human Knowledge Would Suffer Terribly.

My Company Invents All Kinds Of New Technology In Lots Of Different Areas. And We Do That For A Couple Of Reasons. We Invent For Fun - Invention Is A Lot Of Fun To Do - And We Also Invent For Profit. The Two Are Related Because The Profit Actually Takes Long Enough That If It Isn't Fun, You Wouldn't Have The Time To Do It.

Microsoft, Apple, Facebook All Bought Huge Patent Portfolios To Further Their Strategic Game. They're Doing What I'm Doing!

Within Nasa, The Shuttle Is Perhaps The Least-groundbreaking Project. Recall That Apollo Was About Creating Brand-new Technologies That Did Something Unprecedented - Putting Men On The Moon. The Shuttle Is, By Comparison, A Relic Designed To Make Going Into Orbit Routine.

People Get Cranky When You Burst Their Bubble. Over Time, Advances In Astronomy Have Relentlessly Reinforced The Utter Insignificance Of Earth On A Celestial Scale. Fortunately, Political And Religious Leaders Stopped Barbecuing Astronomers For Saying So, Turning Their Spits With Human-rights Activists Instead.