I Say Things That Contradict Each Other,

These Critics Organize And Practice In My Case A Sort Of Obsessive Personality Cult Which Philosophers Should Know How To Question And Above All, To Moderate.

But Can One Not Conceive Of A Presence, And Of A Presence To Itself Of The Subject Before Speech Or Signs, A Presence To Itself Of The Subject In A Silent And Intuitive Consciousness? Such A Question Therefore Presupposes That, Prior To The Sign, And Outside It, Excluding Any Trace And Any Différance, Something Like Consciousness Is Possible.

I Became The Stage For The Great Argument Between Nietzsche And Rousseau. I Was The Extra Ready To Take On All The Roles.

A Determination Or An Effect Within A System Which Is No Longer That Of A Presence But Of A Diffrance, A System That No Longer Tolerates The Opposition Of Activity And Passivity, Nor That Of Cause And Effect, Or Of Indetermination And Determination, Etc., Such That In Designating Consciousness As An Effect Or A Determination, One Continues - For Strategic Reasons That Can Be More Or Less Lucidly Deliberated And Systematically Calculated - To Operate According To The Lexicon Of That Which One Is De-limiting.

But Because Me And Myself, As You No Doubt Are Well Aware, We Are Going To Die, My Relation—and Yours Too—to The Event Of This Text, Which Otherwise Never Quite Makes It, Our Relation Is That Of A Structurally Posthumous Necessity. Suppose, In That Case, That I Am Not Alone In My Claim To Know The Idiomatic Code (whose Notion Itself Is Already Contradictory) Of This Event. What If Somewhere, Here Or There, There Are Shares In This Non-secret’s Secret? Even So The Scene Would Not Be Changed. The Accomplices, As You Are Once Again Well Aware, Are Also Bound To Die.